This is not confined to the Regulation but also to national primary and secondary legislation. Indeed in a recent report, in a complementary area, the International Organisation for Migration noted the complexity of the internal administrative arrangements and the number of public authorities involved at the national level in relation to migration legislation and practice. Such complexity is clearly going to increase on enlargement and this brings me to some observations on a number of practical suggestions.
The various electronic methods of disseminating such information are utilised extensively by the Commission and national institutions. Generally speaking, however, they only emphasise judicial remedies by way of the European Court of Justice. In general they expert property conveyancer do not emphasise the non-judicial role of the European Ombudsman in dealing with complaints and disputes in the area. Given the extent of this role, which I have outlined above, I think it is incumbent on the Commission and national authorities to outline this option to citizens who are making enquiries or complaints in relation to the Regulation.
The high esteem in which his office is held results in a very effective and efficient process with the institutions in this regard. The European Ombudsman Liaison Officers network enables the European Ombudsman to disseminate reports of his decisions and to act as a channel of information about Community law matters. In the most recent issue of the Liaison newsletter I drew attention to a particular problem with the application of the Regulation in this administration, which had a positive outcome for the citizen. This network is complementary to the Administrative Commission and Advisory Committee established under Regulation 1408/71.
The Commission is particularly effective in enabling competent national institutions to keep fully in touch with all developments relating to the Regulation, to contribute directly to resolving problems that arise, framing decisions with agreed interpretations of certain provisions of the Regulation, and agreeing procedures for implementing them. It seems to me that these are issues of complementary interest to the national ombudsmen and that there is a very clear case for some form of practical two-way liaison between these bodies and the Network.